CrawlCheck
Crawler comparisons

Applebot-Extended vs Google-Extended

In the census run that finished 2026-10-24, robots.txt closed the homepage to Applebot-Extended on 498 of the 4,501 top sites that serve a robots.txt (11.1%), and to Google-Extended on 516 (11.5%).

Applebot-ExtendedGoogle-Extended
OperatorAppleGoogle
What it isrobots.txt control token (never sent)robots.txt control token (never sent)
What it doesApple trainingGemini training
How a request can be verifiedIt is a robots.txt control token, not a crawler: no request ever carries this name, so any request that claims it is not from Apple.It is a robots.txt control token, not a crawler: no request ever carries this name, so any request that claims it is not from Google.
robots.txt closes the homepage (of sites with a robots.txt)498 (11.1%)516 (11.5%)
Refused at the door (of sites that answered a browser)not requested as this identitynot requested as this identity

Top 10,000 sites, census of 2026-10-24. “Refused at the door” is a non-2xx answer to a client declaring that name, from CrawlCheck’s own addresses, where the browser got 2xx. Every crawler on the radar.

Let Applebot-Extended in and keep Google-Extended out

User-agent: Applebot-Extended
Allow: /

User-agent: Google-Extended
Disallow: /

A crawler obeys only the most specific group that names it and ignores * entirely. If your User-agent: * group has Disallow rules, repeat them under Applebot-Extended, or naming it drops them. Swap the two names to do the reverse.

Check what your own site tells both: scan it free. Catalogue data CC BY 4.0 at /ai-crawlers.json.