CrawlCheck

Registry

crawler-test.com

Fetched 2026-10-18. Graded C, 56 of 100, 5 findings.

llms.txtagents.mdMedia kitEntity graphAI access policyAgent-callable

Is this your site? Claim this record — free, by DNS TXT or a meta tag.

Get these 5 findings fixed

Every defect this row counts, corrected on the site itself and then re-measured from the outside — done is measured, not asserted. One-time, $500 for one local-business site, thirty days of monitoring included.

Get this fixed — $500

What that covers

Claiming is free and changes nothing but the owner mark. What a licence adds is the record behind this entry: re-measured twice a day, finding age on every defect, change receipts between any two dates. Keep it on the daily record.

What the fetch found

FindingSeverity
Links on this site point at pages that do not answer3 of 5
www and the apex both serve the site instead of one redirecting3 of 5
robots.txt has an unexpected content type2 of 5
No llms.txt1 of 5
HTTPS is served without a Strict-Transport-Security header1 of 5

Section scores on this fetch

Weakest first. 4 of 16 scored sections at 90 or above.

SectionScore
Authorship and trust signals (E-E-A-T proxies)0
Mobile surface0
Schema and entity graph25
Machine layer60
Payload and render path60
Crawl waste67
Sitemap coverage67
Naming and case consistency71
Server and hosting75
Speed a crawler sees, and field data where it exists80
Internal linking80
Accessibility structure (from the delivered HTML)82
AI and search agents100
Machine-file trust chain100
Agent instruction surface100
What each agent receives100

Shelves

ShelfStateDefinition
llms.txtnot foundWhat counts, and who has it
agents.mdnot foundWhat counts, and who has it
Media kitnot foundWhat counts, and who has it
Entity graphnot foundWhat counts, and who has it
AI access policyon the shelfWhat counts, and who has it
Agent-callablenot foundWhat counts, and who has it

The full report for this fetch

Machine-readable: /api/registry?host=crawler-test.com. This row states what was served to CrawlCheck at that time. It is not an endorsement, and it says nothing this scan did not measure.