Directory · Inference and GPU compute
SambaNova — what a crawler receives from sambanova.ai
Website measurement, not a product review. This page records what machine clients received from sambanova.ai. It does not evaluate SambaNova software, features, pricing or support.
AI assistants like ChatGPT can reach your site, but get very little they can use.
AI visibility 72/100, measured 2026-11-01 08:04 UTC from outside its network, as each named AI and search crawler and as a browser. An engine can technically reach this site and would struggle to get anything quotable out of it.
Held at C A medium-severity finding sets the letter.
3
findings
✗
llms.txt on its host
✗
entity map on its host
10
scans on record since 2026-09-18
The three stages, in the order an engine hits a site
Each stage gates the next: an engine that cannot reach a page never reads it, and one that cannot read it never quotes it.
Stage 1 · 40% of the score
Reach
Can a named answer-engine crawler get your pages at all?
At least one answer engine was refused, challenged or served less than a browser.
Stage 2 · 30% of the score
Read
Once it has the bytes, can it find the words?
The content is buried in markup, or the files that guide a crawler are missing.
Stage 3 · 30% of the score
Quote
Is there a specific fact it can state and attribute?
An assistant would have to paraphrase your page instead of quoting a fact.
- Structured data38
- Local presence & NAPn/a
- Claim consistencyn/a
- Authors & trust signals75
- Linked datan/a
- Quotable content50
- Entity corroborationn/a
- Page subjectn/a
The stage to fix first is quote, the lowest of the three.
What to fix
3 findings on this site, 2 of them scored serious. Every one is named below; the top one is shown in full, free. What we saw, why each matters, how to fix it and the bytes behind it are what a licence buys — or we implement the whole list for you.
2 Medium 1 Note
1robots.txt declares no sitemapNo Sitemap: directive present.MediumSetting
What we saw
No Sitemap: directive present. /robots.txt
Why it matters
Adding one Sitemap: line lets crawlers enumerate the site instead of guessing at it.
How to fix it
Add a Sitemap: line to robots.txt pointing at the full sitemap URL, so crawlers find it without guessing.
Setting: a setting on the server, CDN, DNS or a plugin — no code and no writing
Site deployed from GitHub
- Add this workflow file as
.github/workflows/crawlcheck.yml(changerobots-pathif robots.txt lives elsewhere). - Run it from the Actions tab: it opens one pull request with the corrected robots.txt, every change listed. Review, merge, deploy.
Paste this
Add this line anywhere in robots.txt.
Sitemap: https://sambanova.ai/sitemap.xmlThe whole corrected robots.txt for sambanova.ai · built from the live file, every change listed at the top.
Fix it with a coding agent
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex, opened on the code that serves this site.
Show prompt
You are working in the codebase (or server/CDN configuration) that serves sambanova.ai. A crawler audit found the problem below. Fix it at the source, keep the change as small as possible, and do not change anything a visitor sees unless the fix requires it. Finding: robots.txt declares no sitemap (ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP, medium severity) Page: https://sambanova.ai/robots.txt What was measured: No Sitemap: directive present. Why it matters: Adding one Sitemap: line lets crawlers enumerate the site instead of guessing at it. How to fix it: Add a Sitemap: line to robots.txt pointing at the full sitemap URL, so crawlers find it without guessing. Rule and examples: https://crawlcheck.io/rules/ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP Full report (markdown): https://crawlcheck.io/r/k35adlhcb9.md When you are done: 1. Tell me which files or settings you changed and why. 2. If the fix is a server, CDN or cache setting you cannot change from the code, say exactly where it is set. 3. After deploying, re-scan at https://crawlcheck.io/?url=sambanova.ai . The fix counts when ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP is gone from the new report.
Why this was decided
| Rule | ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP · rule pack sv34 · scope core |
|---|---|
| Evaluated | 2026-11-01 08:04:12 UTC |
| Decision | d1:ea1c0ec97fbe672fed02 · finding f1:04f1e85c88cc19fc418d resolve either at /api/graph/<id> with a key |
| Observer | crawlcheck-worker build d98be86e from LAX · audit v4 |
What it rests on
| Identity | Status | Bytes | sha256 | Kept |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| read: /robots.txt | 200 | 787 | 5c71376ab0ca | already_held |
21 more in the manifest.
Artifacts: manifest:f88052c82dc313505feaa68dabc362f437850db4ada6475fab6cd0b0b31f7636
Grade effect Caps the letter at C together with 1 other medium-severity finding; the letter rises only when all of them are gone. Moves no points.
Rule ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP under scoring rules v34 · fingerprint ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP|/robots.txt · persisting (10 scans)
Verify the fix Re-scan after the change. This finding is cleared when ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP is no longer reported at /robots.txt; if it comes back after clearing, it is marked a regression, not a new finding.
ROBOTS_NO_SITEMAP · full transcript
Open the other 2
What we saw, why it matters, how to fix it, and the evidence bytes for every finding — on this report and every re-scan. From $29 a month.
Unlock the findingsOr have them fixed
We implement the list on your site and re-measure, with a sealed before and after. One site, $100 once.
Get this fixed — $100The main product
We fix the 3 findings on sambanova.ai. $100, once.
2 of them are scored serious. One site. You keep the grade for free — this is the part where the list stops being a list.
- Every finding implemented on the site itself: machine files, schema, NAP, the lot
- An entity map authored for your business, not a template with the name swapped
- Measured again afterwards — the before and the after, sealed, so it is evidenced rather than claimed
- Thirty days of monitoring included
- Work starts within two business days
What it covers · one payment, nothing recurring
The chain a crawler follows
The chain breaks at llms.txt. Everything after that point is only reachable by a crawler guessing the conventional path.
A machine file that does not parse is worth less than one that is absent, because it looks present. Rows behind this.
Where the bytes go
Of the 175,548 decompressed bytes the homepage delivers, 3.8% is text a reader or a model can actually use. Most of what a crawler downloads here is not words.
- Readable text 3.8% · 6,718 B
- Markup & attributes 55.8% · 97,880 B
- Inline CSS 13.4% · 23,452 B
- Inline JavaScript 10.5% · 18,480 B
- Inline SVG 14.5% · 25,418 B
- HTML comments 2.1% · 3,600 B
The individual blocks that weigh the most, so the fix is a search rather than a hunt:
- Inline CSS · 8,125 B (4.6%) —
#hs_editor_styleopens.above_header-row-0-max-width-section-centering > .row-fluid { max-wid - Inline CSS · 6,727 B (3.8%) — unnamedopens
.absolute-sovereignty .feature-card__title { min-height: 70px; } @medi - Inline SVG · 4,965 B (2.8%) —
#Layer_1opens<polygon points="3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3" style="fill: none;"></polygon> <poly - Inline JavaScript · 4,757 B (2.7%) — unnamedopens
function setCookie(name, value, days) { var expires = ""; if (days) { - Inline JavaScript · 3,868 B (2.2%) — Google Tag Manager or gtagopens
(function () { 'use strict'; /* ----------------------------- config -
What changed
- 2026-11-01score moved 75 → 74score-down
- 2026-11-01score moved 71 → 75score-up
- 2026-10-08the shadowed robots rules clearedresolved
10 scans on record, first 2026-09-18. Score movements are shown only between readings taken under the same score version; finding codes are comparable across all of them.
Is this your site?
This listing reads the public record. Claim it and Watch keeps that record on your terms: every list this page holds back, finding age, and twice-daily re-measurement. Free for 30 days, no card.
Claim the record for sambanova.aiIs this your company?
This listing came from a fetch, not a submission, so nobody was asked. If sambanova.ai is yours you can prove it in a minute and for nothing — a DNS TXT record or one meta tag on the home page, both checkable by anyone.
Claiming marks you as the verified owner and lets you correct the category and the company name. It moves no score, no rank and no position.
Claim this listing — free or ask about a verified profile
Dispute or re-scan
If a reading here is wrong, it is our instrument that is wrong, and we want to know. Tell us what is wrong and the site is re-measured; the result is published as measured. Nothing about a listing, a payment or a request changes a number.
By email instead: hello@crawlcheck.io. Category “Inference and GPU compute” is our label for what the product is primarily sold as; it is not scored. Back to the directory.