CrawlCheck

Directory · ML platforms and experiment tracking

Domino Data Lab — what a crawler receives from domino.ai

Website measurement, not a product review. This page records what machine clients received from domino.ai. It does not evaluate Domino Data Lab software, features, pricing or support.

77
Dgrade

AI assistants are being shown something other than your site.

AI visibility 77/100, measured 2026-11-11 02:02 UTC from outside its network, as each named AI and search crawler and as a browser. An engine can reach and read this site. What is left is giving it something specific to say.

Held at D A high-severity finding sets the letter.

Open the full report domino.ai ↗

5

findings

✓

llms.txt on its host

✗

entity map on its host

12

scans on record since 2026-09-18

The three stages, in the order an engine hits a site

Each stage gates the next: an engine that cannot reach a page never reads it, and one that cannot read it never quotes it.

87

Stage 1 · 40% of the score

Reach

Can a named answer-engine crawler get your pages at all?

Every named crawler was served the same page a browser gets.

67

Stage 2 · 30% of the score

Read

Once it has the bytes, can it find the words?

The content is buried in markup, or the files that guide a crawler are missing.

73

Stage 3 · 30% of the score

Quote

Is there a specific fact it can state and attribute?

An assistant would have to paraphrase your page instead of quoting a fact.

The stage to fix first is read, the lowest of the three.

What to fix

5 findings on this site, 4 of them scored serious. Every one is named below; the top one is shown in full, free. What we saw, why each matters, how to fix it and the bytes behind it are what a licence buys — or we implement the whole list for you.

1 High 3 Medium 1 Note

1Crawlers are given scripts, links or instructions that visitors never seeBingbot got text a visitor never gets (“domino data lab accelerate and scale enterprise ai skip to main conte…”). Applebot got text a visitor never gets (“domiHighSettingSeen once

What we saw

Bingbot got text a visitor never gets (“domino data lab accelerate and scale enterprise ai skip to main conte…”). Applebot got text a visitor never gets (“domino data lab accelerate and scale enterprise ai skip to main conte…”). The unnamed client got none of this in any round.

Why it matters

When an AI or search crawler asks for this page it receives something an ordinary visitor does not: a script from another host, links to other sites, or text written to an AI. Nobody reviewing the page in a browser sees it, and the AI treats it as part of the site. That is how a site, its CMS plugin or an attacker who got into it plants instructions or links for AI answers; it can also be a bot-only tag the owner added on purpose. Either way the AI is reading a page the owner's visitors are not.

How to fix it

Find what adds content by user agent (a plugin, an edge rule, a prerender service, or injected code) and serve crawlers the page visitors get; if the extra is yours on purpose, put it in the visitor page too.

Setting: a setting on the server, CDN, DNS or a plugin — no code and no writing

Fix it with a coding agent

Paste into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex, opened on the code that serves this site.

Show prompt
You are working in the codebase (or server/CDN configuration) that serves domino.ai. A crawler audit found the problem below. Fix it at the source, keep the change as small as possible, and do not change anything a visitor sees unless the fix requires it.

Finding: Crawlers are given scripts, links or instructions that visitors never see (CRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA, high severity)
Page: https://domino.ai/
What was measured: Bingbot got text a visitor never gets (“domino data lab  accelerate and scale enterprise ai skip to main conte…”). Applebot got text a visitor never gets (“domino data lab  accelerate and scale enterprise ai skip to main conte…”). The unnamed client got none of this in any round.
Why it matters: When an AI or search crawler asks for this page it receives something an ordinary visitor does not: a script from another host, links to other sites, or text written to an AI. Nobody reviewing the page in a browser sees it, and the AI treats it as part of the site. That is how a site, its CMS plugin or an attacker who got into it plants instructions or links for AI answers; it can also be a bot-only tag the owner added on purpose. Either way the AI is reading a page the owner's visitors are not.
How to fix it: Find what adds content by user agent (a plugin, an edge rule, a prerender service, or injected code) and serve crawlers the page visitors get; if the extra is yours on purpose, put it in the visitor page too.
Detected platform: Next.js. Make the change where this platform controls it.
Rule and examples: https://crawlcheck.io/rules/CRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA
Full report (markdown): https://crawlcheck.io/r/48dwpikxjs.md

When you are done:
1. Tell me which files or settings you changed and why.
2. If the fix is a server, CDN or cache setting you cannot change from the code, say exactly where it is set.
3. After deploying, re-scan at https://crawlcheck.io/?url=domino.ai . The fix counts when CRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA is gone from the new report.
Why this was decided
RuleCRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA · rule pack sv34 · scope route
Evaluated2026-11-11 02:02:43 UTC
Decisiond1:02a1b319676bad25fe99 · finding f1:6a72f12193b30f1e06f5 resolve either at /api/graph/<id> with a key
Observercrawlcheck-worker build 101a018d · audit v4

What it rests on

IdentityStatusBytessha256Kept
baseline: Unnamed client200984,002bb8889a68b5fkept
compared: Bingbot200983,42560a45bc4f6d1kept
compared: Applebot200983,4253096cd0df257kept

23 more in the manifest.

Artifacts: manifest:e9f7947058baa155e44cd3c969ace8d2df133ca72249d808cbcfbe0e08780760

Grade effect Caps the letter at D. Without it the letter would be C (score 77). Moves no points; the score is built from the measured rows.

Rule CRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA under scoring rules v34 · fingerprint CRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA|/ · new on this scan (seen in 1 of 13 readings)

Verify the fix Re-scan after the change. This finding is cleared when CRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA is no longer reported at /; if it comes back after clearing, it is marked a regression, not a new finding.

CRAWLER_SERVED_EXTRA · full transcript

2The ARD manifest breaks the specification/.well-known/ard.json🔒 What we saw, why it matters, the fix and the evidence bytes are in the licensed report.Medium
3A machine file is served to browsers but not to crawlers/llms.txt🔒 What we saw, why it matters, the fix and the evidence bytes are in the licensed report.Medium
4Almost nothing a machine receives from this page is readable text🔒 What we saw, why it matters, the fix and the evidence bytes are in the licensed report.Medium
5The homepage is reached through a chain of redirects🔒 What we saw, why it matters, the fix and the evidence bytes are in the licensed report.Note

Open the other 4

What we saw, why it matters, how to fix it, and the evidence bytes for every finding — on this report and every re-scan. From $29 a month.

Unlock the findings

Or have them fixed

We implement the list on your site and re-measure, with a sealed before and after. One site, $100 once.

Get this fixed — $100

The chain a crawler follows

The chain breaks at entity graph. Everything after that point is only reachable by a crawler guessing the conventional path.

✓robots.txtEvery crawler reads this first
✓sitemapNamed in robots.txt and resolves
✓llms.txtPoints onward, links stay on this host
✗entity graphParses as JSON and points home

A machine file that does not parse is worth less than one that is absent, because it looks present. Rows behind this.

Where the bytes go

Of the 983,951 decompressed bytes the homepage delivers, 0.6% is text a reader or a model can actually use. Most of what a crawler downloads here is not words.

  • Readable text 0.6% · 6,367 B
  • Markup & attributes 17.1% · 168,558 B
  • Structured data (JSON-LD) 0.6% · 5,516 B
  • Inline CSS 18.7% · 184,409 B
  • Inline JavaScript 62% · 610,286 B
  • Inline SVG 0.9% · 8,713 B
  • HTML comments 0% · 102 B

The individual blocks that weigh the most, so the fix is a search rather than a hunt:

  • Inline CSS · 184,409 B (18.7%) — unnamedopens @layer properties{@supports (((-webkit-hyphens:none)) and (not (margin
  • Inline JavaScript · 142,178 B (14.4%) — unnamedopens self.__next_f.push([1,"@layer properties{@supports (((-webkit-hyphens:
  • Inline JavaScript · 142,178 B (14.4%) — unnamedopens self.__next_f.push([1,"@layer properties{@supports (((-webkit-hyphens:
  • Inline JavaScript · 44,086 B (4.5%) — unnamedopens self.__next_f.push([1,":root{--rpv-core__annotation--link-hover-backgr
  • Inline JavaScript · 44,086 B (4.5%) — unnamedopens self.__next_f.push([1,":root{--rpv-core__annotation--link-hover-backgr
Section average over 5 scans on this score version · held at 77 since 2026-11-11
0501002026-10-27 05:26 · 80/100 · 2 findings2026-10-30 01:41 · 79/100 · 2 findings2026-11-01 13:29 · 77/100 · 3 findings2026-11-01 13:29 · 78/100 · 3 findings2026-11-11 02:02 · 77/100 · 5 findings2026-10-272026-11-11

What changed

  1. 2026-11-11score moved 75 → 74score-down
  2. 2026-11-11a new finding appeared: crawlers are given scripts, links or instructions that visitors never seeappeared
  3. 2026-11-11a new finding appeared: the ard manifest breaks the specificationappeared
  4. 2026-11-01score moved 74 → 75score-up
  5. 2026-11-01score moved 77 → 74score-down
  6. 2026-11-01a new finding appeared: a machine file is served to browsers but not to crawlersappeared
  7. 2026-10-16the homepage began taking more than one redirect to reachappeared
  8. 2026-10-03score moved 77 → 78score-up
  9. 2026-10-03resolved: the machine files cost more than the pageresolved

12 scans on record, first 2026-09-18. Score movements are shown only between readings taken under the same score version; finding codes are comparable across all of them.

Is this your site?

This listing reads the public record. Claim it and Watch keeps that record on your terms: every list this page holds back, finding age, and twice-daily re-measurement. Free for 30 days, no card.

Claim the record for domino.ai

Is this your company?

This listing came from a fetch, not a submission, so nobody was asked. If domino.ai is yours you can prove it in a minute and for nothing — a DNS TXT record or one meta tag on the home page, both checkable by anyone.

Claiming marks you as the verified owner and lets you correct the category and the company name. It moves no score, no rank and no position.

Claim this listing — free or ask about a verified profile

Dispute or re-scan

If a reading here is wrong, it is our instrument that is wrong, and we want to know. Tell us what is wrong and the site is re-measured; the result is published as measured. Nothing about a listing, a payment or a request changes a number.

By email instead: hello@crawlcheck.io. Category “ML platforms and experiment tracking” is our label for what the product is primarily sold as; it is not scored. Back to the directory.