CrawlCheck

Directory · AI writing and content

Wordtune — what a crawler receives from wordtune.com

Website measurement, not a product review. This page records what machine clients received from wordtune.com. It does not evaluate Wordtune software, features, pricing or support.

81
Cgrade

AI assistants like ChatGPT can read your site, but find little they can quote from your pages.

AI visibility 81/100, measured 2026-11-02 01:06 UTC from outside its network, as each named AI and search crawler and as a browser. An engine can reach and read this site. What is left is giving it something specific to say.

Held at C A medium-severity finding sets the letter.

Open the full report wordtune.com ↗

3

findings

✗

llms.txt on its host

✗

entity map on its host

8

scans on record since 2026-09-18

The three stages, in the order an engine hits a site

Each stage gates the next: an engine that cannot reach a page never reads it, and one that cannot read it never quotes it.

97

Stage 1 · 40% of the score

Reach

Can a named answer-engine crawler get your pages at all?

Every named crawler was served the same page a browser gets.

76

Stage 2 · 30% of the score

Read

Once it has the bytes, can it find the words?

The content is buried in markup, or the files that guide a crawler are missing.

63

Stage 3 · 30% of the score

Quote

Is there a specific fact it can state and attribute?

An assistant would have to paraphrase your page instead of quoting a fact.

The stage to fix first is quote, the lowest of the three.

What to fix

3 findings on this site, 1 of them scored serious. Every one is named below; the top one is shown in full, free. What we saw, why each matters, how to fix it and the bytes behind it are what a licence buys — or we implement the whole list for you.

1 Medium 2 Note

1www and the apex both serve the site instead of one redirectingwww.wordtune.com answers 200 and stays there: 124,083 bytes against 124,079 on the apex. Every page exists at two addresses.MediumSetting

What we saw

www.wordtune.com answers 200 and stays there: 124,083 bytes against 124,079 on the apex. Every page exists at two addresses.

Why it matters

Both www and the bare domain answer 200 with the same pages, so every URL on this site exists at two addresses and a crawler fetches the whole site twice. A canonical tag does not prevent this: it is read after the response arrives, so the second fetch has already been spent. Nothing looks broken from a browser, which is why this survives for years. The fix is a 301 from one host to the other so there is one address per page.

How to fix it

Pick one host (apex or www) and redirect the other to it with a 301 so there is one copy of every page.

Setting: a setting on the server, CDN, DNS or a plugin — no code and no writing

Fix it with a coding agent

Paste into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex, opened on the code that serves this site.

Show prompt
You are working in the codebase (or server/CDN configuration) that serves wordtune.com. A crawler audit found the problem below. Fix it at the source, keep the change as small as possible, and do not change anything a visitor sees unless the fix requires it.

Finding: www and the apex both serve the site instead of one redirecting (HOST_DUPLICATE_200, medium severity)
Page: https://wordtune.com/
What was measured: www.wordtune.com answers 200 and stays there: 124,083 bytes against 124,079 on the apex. Every page exists at two addresses.
Why it matters: Both www and the bare domain answer 200 with the same pages, so every URL on this site exists at two addresses and a crawler fetches the whole site twice. A canonical tag does not prevent this: it is read after the response arrives, so the second fetch has already been spent. Nothing looks broken from a browser, which is why this survives for years. The fix is a 301 from one host to the other so there is one address per page.
How to fix it: Pick one host (apex or www) and redirect the other to it with a 301 so there is one copy of every page.
Detected platform: Webflow. Make the change where this platform controls it.
Rule and examples: https://crawlcheck.io/rules/HOST_DUPLICATE_200
Full report (markdown): https://crawlcheck.io/r/y5qz0mjdxc.md

When you are done:
1. Tell me which files or settings you changed and why.
2. If the fix is a server, CDN or cache setting you cannot change from the code, say exactly where it is set.
3. After deploying, re-scan at https://crawlcheck.io/?url=wordtune.com . The fix counts when HOST_DUPLICATE_200 is gone from the new report.
Why this was decided
RuleHOST_DUPLICATE_200 · rule pack sv34 · scope core
Evaluated2026-11-02 01:06:01 UTC
Decisiond1:567430bdb266d8e87b4a · finding f1:b0f7f95d10fbea695f7f resolve either at /api/graph/<id> with a key
Observercrawlcheck-worker build 85b8d8fc from SIN · audit v4

What it rests on

IdentityStatusBytessha256Kept
read: /200124,0795407c571d156already_held

24 more in the manifest.

Artifacts: manifest:d9a65acb4d5d83e0be24d983e1216377e37f3fbdbf87b72a274be1b66223d5f2

Grade effect Caps the letter at C. Without it the letter would be B (score 81). Moves no points; the score is built from the measured rows.

Rule HOST_DUPLICATE_200 under scoring rules v34 · fingerprint HOST_DUPLICATE_200|/ · persisting (9 scans)

Verify the fix Re-scan after the change. This finding is cleared when HOST_DUPLICATE_200 is no longer reported at /; if it comes back after clearing, it is marked a regression, not a new finding.

HOST_DUPLICATE_200 · full transcript

2No llms.txt/llms.txt🔒 What we saw, why it matters, the fix and the evidence bytes are in the licensed report.Note
3Visitors and crawlers are being served an old copy of this page🔒 What we saw, why it matters, the fix and the evidence bytes are in the licensed report.Note

Open the other 2

What we saw, why it matters, how to fix it, and the evidence bytes for every finding — on this report and every re-scan. From $29 a month.

Unlock the findings

Or have them fixed

We implement the list on your site and re-measure, with a sealed before and after. One site, $100 once.

Get this fixed — $100

Sites like yours that fixed the same problem

Matched on Webflow. A fix counts once two readings confirm it; sites are not named. Read from the technology record of 2026-10-25.

serves no /llms.txt

5 sites on a stack like yours have made this fix (Published llms.txt); 5 still hold it. 75 on any stack.

  • similar site A (Webflow; shares platform): fixed 2026-10-31, still fixed today
  • similar site B (Webflow + Cloudflare; shares platform): fixed 2026-10-24, still fixed today
  • similar site C (Webflow; shares platform): fixed 2026-10-23, still fixed today

serves no /agents.md (optional)

2 sites on a stack like yours have made this fix (Published agents.md); 2 still hold it. 15 on any stack.

  • similar site A (Webflow; shares platform): fixed 2026-10-24, still fixed today
  • similar site B (Webflow + Cloudflare; shares platform): fixed 2026-10-24, still fixed today

The signed answer lists every match.

The chain a crawler follows

The chain breaks at llms.txt. Everything after that point is only reachable by a crawler guessing the conventional path.

✓robots.txtEvery crawler reads this first
✓sitemapNamed in robots.txt and resolves
✗llms.txtPoints onward, links stay on this host
✗entity graphParses as JSON and points home

A machine file that does not parse is worth less than one that is absent, because it looks present. Rows behind this.

Where the bytes go

Of the 124,029 decompressed bytes the homepage delivers, 6.1% is text a reader or a model can actually use. Most of what a crawler downloads here is not words.

  • Readable text 6.1% · 7,516 B
  • Markup & attributes 35.2% · 43,712 B
  • Inline CSS 9.3% · 11,546 B
  • Inline JavaScript 16% · 19,802 B
  • Inline SVG 32.9% · 40,821 B
  • HTML comments 0.5% · 632 B

The individual blocks that weigh the most, so the fix is a search rather than a hunt:

  • Inline SVG · 9,561 B (7.7%) — unnamedopens <path d="M19.4096 22.7646C19.1688 23.033 18.949 23.3738 18.7606 23.735
  • Inline SVG · 9,556 B (7.7%) — unnamedopens <path d="M12.0555 14.1395C11.9059 14.3062 11.7694 14.5179 11.6523 14.7
  • Inline CSS · 6,796 B (5.5%) — unnamedopens @media (min-width:992px) {html.w-mod-js:not(.w-mod-ix) [data-w-id="76f
  • Inline JavaScript · 5,958 B (4.8%) — Google Tag Manager or gtagopens (function(){ function isStaging(){ return !window.location.hostname.in
  • Inline CSS · 4,036 B (3.3%) — unnamedopens /* Thanks: https://finsweet.com/client-first/docs/global-styles-embed

What changed

  1. 2026-10-02score moved 80 → 81score-up
  2. 2026-09-19a stale edge copy was servedappeared

8 scans on record, first 2026-09-18. Score movements are shown only between readings taken under the same score version; finding codes are comparable across all of them.

Is this your site?

This listing reads the public record. Claim it and Watch keeps that record on your terms: every list this page holds back, finding age, and twice-daily re-measurement. Free for 30 days, no card.

Claim the record for wordtune.com

Is this your company?

This listing came from a fetch, not a submission, so nobody was asked. If wordtune.com is yours you can prove it in a minute and for nothing — a DNS TXT record or one meta tag on the home page, both checkable by anyone.

Claiming marks you as the verified owner and lets you correct the category and the company name. It moves no score, no rank and no position.

Claim this listing — free or ask about a verified profile

Dispute or re-scan

If a reading here is wrong, it is our instrument that is wrong, and we want to know. Tell us what is wrong and the site is re-measured; the result is published as measured. Nothing about a listing, a payment or a request changes a number.

By email instead: hello@crawlcheck.io. Category “AI writing and content” is our label for what the product is primarily sold as; it is not scored. Back to the directory.